![cover image of An Analysis of the Interaction between the Editing/Montage and Spectator](https://img1.od-cdn.com/ImageType-400/6580-1/3E6/921/8D/{3E69218D-4FAB-418E-BF8E-AEE029FA5FBA}Img400.jpg)
Sign up to save your library
With an OverDrive account, you can save your favorite libraries for at-a-glance information about availability. Find out more about OverDrive accounts.
Find this title in Libby, the library reading app by OverDrive.
![LibbyDevices.png](https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blt3d151d94546d0edd/blt96637953bca8f11b/642dbad30afb1c108e793645/LibbyDevices.png)
Search for a digital library with this title
Title found at these libraries:
Loading... |
Essay from the year 2013 in the subject Film Science, grade: B+, Edinburgh Napier University, language: English, abstract: This essay analyses early theories in regards to editing and montage as a film form and its relationship to the meaning that it creates in spectator's mind. The main statement to prove in this essay is that controlling editing methods ignores the spectator's imagination and conflictive editing is the right method to interact with spectator's mind creatively. The essay considers Hugo Munsterberg, Sergei Eisenstein and Vsevolod Pudovkin's essays by clarifying the major points and debating the similarities and dissimilarities between the three arguments.