Comments on Janice Breidenbach's Essay (2018) "Action, Agency, and Substance Causation"

ebook Peirce's Secondness and Aristotle's Hylomorphism, #19 · Peirce's Secondness and Aristotle's Hylomorphism

By Razie Mah

cover image of Comments on Janice Breidenbach's Essay (2018) "Action, Agency, and Substance Causation"

Sign up to save your library

With an OverDrive account, you can save your favorite libraries for at-a-glance information about availability. Find out more about OverDrive accounts.

   Not today

Find this title in Libby, the library reading app by OverDrive.

Download Libby on the App Store Download Libby on Google Play

Search for a digital library with this title

Title found at these libraries:

Library Name Distance
Loading...

Janice Breidenbach publishes chapter 10 in a recent book, Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science, edited by William M. R. Simpson, Robert C. Koons and Nicholas Teh (2018, Routledge, pages 236-260). The title is "Action, Agency and Substance Causation".
Action does not necessitate agency, even though we think that it does. Our attitude could be some mental adaptation. But, even with that point of view, the question remains, "What does action and agency hold in common?"
The title suggests an answer.
These comments use the category-based nested form and other relational models developed within the tradition of C. S. Peirce.

Comments on Janice Breidenbach's Essay (2018) "Action, Agency, and Substance Causation"