WHAT CAUSED THE CREATION OF LIFE AND OF THE UNIVERSE?

Did life begin by inevitable natural, undirected chance processes without the need for cognitive abilities of a designer? And what caused the origin of the universe? Did it also start without conscious thought, cognitive abilities, planning, knowledge, or understanding?

The document "Evidence Clearly seen" by Eugene Glenn, is a comprehensive text discussing the relationship between evidence seen within the complexity of what is made and the corresponding level of cognitive abilities that were required to make it.

As we explore science, the author guides you on an adventure while examining the evidence using the scientific method and makes predictions to investigate how to best explain the very important questions of the origin of life and the universe. As we journey along the way, we should ask: "Are we following the evidence wherever it leads?".

This book is about origin of life from scratch. Evolution and natural selection can't be invoked for origin of life. The 2 opposing hypothesis are:

1. Creation (advanced cognitive abilities, knowledge, understanding, and workmanship of an intelligent agent designer. In other words: Work)

2. Abiogenesis (spontaneous life by natural, undirected, chance processes with zero IQ. A theory in the evolution of early life on earth: organic molecules and subsequent simple life forms first originated from inorganic substances. In other words: Magic)

When considering the origin of life or of the universe, natural selection type processes cannot be invoked in a blind watchmaker argument unless and until Abiogenesis Research can actually make some reasonable progress to explain chirality, functional proteins, corresponding DNA and or RNA from scratch.

The author guides you through and itemizes the details of what science actually says so that you can evaluate the evidence for yourself.

The journey begins by presenting the "Watchmaker's Argument" along with the contrasting "Blind Watchmaker's Argument" by Richard Dawkins.

Along the way, the author engages AI (ChatGPT) with many profoundly probing questions and deep debates.

The author, Eugene Glenn, focuses on the idea that the scientific method and empirical evidence can be used to make scientific predictions, arguing that the complexity found in nature, from the cellular level to the structure of the universe, points to the existence of an intelligent agent designer.

The document presents the "Complexity versus Intelligence Equation" (A*P*IC*SC ∝ minimum IQ required), where 'A' stands for accuracy, 'P' for precision, 'IC' for irreducible complexity, and 'SC' for specified complexity. This equation suggests that the cognitive abilities required to create something complex are proportional to the intricacy, precision, and complexity of the object or system in question. The document argues that this equation is intuitively used to recognize intelligent design. It posits that by examining evidence for each variable (A, P, IC, SC) and comparing them to levels found in modern technologies, one can determine if the evidence points to cognitive abilities above or below human levels.

AI (ChatGPT):

"The "Complexity versus Intelligence Equation" you've proposed represents an intriguing conceptual framework for attempting to quantify the relationship between the complexity of a system and the intelligence required to create it. Let's explore the components of your equation and its implications in the context of both artificial and potential supernatural intelligence: ..."